Documented Just in Time (leans on the pre-1857 timing point)
Sir Sayyid Ahmad Khan's Asar-us-Sanadid works as a survey as
much as a history. The 1847 volume is largely narrative, but the 1854 volume
treats the monuments the way a documentation team would: dimensions,
elevations, inscriptions, historical references and drawn plates. He copied
inscriptions himself, even hanging from the Qutub Minar in a basket to reach
them. For anyone working in heritage, that insistence on recording the building
before interpreting it is the lesson.
The book's real value is timing. It was
compiled before 1857, before the demolitions around the Red Fort, before
Lutyens' Delhi, before Partition and before modern encroachment. Many of these
structures now survive only in his measurements and sketches.
Mehrauli as a landscape system
Mehrauli's gardens and pavilions were not isolated buildings but one designed landscape, organised around water.
The hydraulic logic.
Hauz-e-Shamsi, the great reservoir attributed to Iltutmish, was the source. Firoz Shah Tughluq's dam controlled its overflow, once carrying surplus water toward the moats of Tughlaqabad. When that fort was abandoned, the water was left with nowhere useful to go. Later, Ghazi-ud-Din Khan Firoz Jung built a tank, channels and chutes, turning a drainage problem into the Jharna, a waterfall used for pleasure. Infrastructure was reused as architecture.
The western pavilion.
This is the most closely measured
building in the account. It stands on a plinth about 11'5" high and has
three arches, with the waterfall passing over it. Thirteen small pipes under
the roof feed water down through the structure, and a 3.2-foot-wide chute drops
about 4.3 feet into a 25-foot-square tank, 7.6 feet deep. Niches behind the
falling water held lit lamps, so the water, light and masonry worked as one
composition. The tank also served as a diving pool, and its depth explains why
the roof was used as a launch point.
The
other pavilions. Each edge of the water garden had
a different building:
•
North: a double pavilion, built under
Akbar II.
•
South: a three-arched pavilion flanked
by two smaller ones, which reads as five arches, with two doors beside it
making seven.
•
East: no building, only the hillside,
with a stone slide about 18'3" by 7'7" cut into it.
The edges were composed deliberately: built
frontage on three sides, natural rock on the fourth, mango orchard beyond.
Bagh-e-Nazir
This was a walled garden with red sandstone
buildings set along the inside of the boundary and one central pavilion, the
largest and finest. That is a classic char-bagh-influenced
arrangement: a perimeter wall, edge buildings and a dominant centre. Sayyid
Ahmad chose that central pavilion for illustration.
What remains
Today the garden is the Ashoka Mission, and
the Jharna pavilions are desolate. Hauz-e-Shamsi is stagnant, its orchard
replaced by housing. Sayyid Ahmad's account is now the main evidence for how
this landscape worked.
Takeaways for practice
1.
Record before you interpret:
measure, draw and copy inscriptions.
2.
Read heritage sites as systems
(water, topography, planting and building together), not as isolated monuments.
3.
Adaptive reuse is old. Firoz
Jung's tank and Mehrauli's later reuse show that buildings survive by finding
new functions.
Excerpts from Asar-us-Sanadid, Sayyid Ahmad Khan, translated and edited by Rana Safvi, Tulika Books






No comments:
Post a Comment